Which of the following situations does NOT warrant a mandatory waveoff?

The situation described as utilizing more than a 30° angle of bank (AOB) to establish on final does not warrant a mandatory waveoff because this is a common maneuver during approach that pilots may use to align with the runway. A bank angle exceeding 30° can be a part of normal operating procedures under certain conditions, such as when adjusting the flight path for established final approach.

In general, the requirement for a waveoff occurs in scenarios that present safety risks or violate standard operating procedures. For instance, stick shaker activation generally indicates that the aircraft is approaching a stall condition, which certainly calls for immediate corrective action rather than continuing the approach. Externally being directed to waveoff by a Registered Duty Officer (RDO) or tower signifies an operational concern that must be followed for safety. Additionally, rolling out on a straightaway before the preceding aircraft has landed presents a significant risk of collision, thus necessitating a mandatory waveoff to ensure safe separation between aircraft.

In contrast, using more than a 30° AOB on approach, while it does require good judgment and situational awareness, does not automatically imply a hazardous situation that necessitates a waveoff. Therefore, it is not classified as a situation that warrants a mandatory